Log Page view

You may post here if you are having problems with Winlog32 that others may be able to help you with. You may also report bugs so that the author may act upon them.
Post Reply
DL4KG
Bit of a boffin
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2002 5:09 am
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Contact:

Log Page view

Post by DL4KG »

I don´t want the USER field in the log page view. I deletd the mark in the Options menue and I saw in the INI file that the related entry was set to 0. But when starting WL32 V2.4 again the USER field comes up again. What can I do to force WL32 to recognize the setting in the INI file?
It worked without problems in the previous version.



73 de Gerald - DL4KG

www.qsl.net/dl4kg

Meanwhile I renamed the INI file and started WL32 from scratch but WL32 came back with the same result. After closing and starting again the USER field came up again. The related line in the INI file showed value 0 before.

Edited by - dl4kg on 27/12/2003 2:23:33 PM
73 de Gerald - DL4KG
G0CUZ
Site Admin
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 7:12 am

Log Page view

Post by G0CUZ »

This is a bug that would affect all 'hidden' fields in Page view, thanks for spotting it Gerald, it is fixed and I will release the fixed version shortly.

73 Colin G0CUZ
Winlog32 Author
DL4KG
Bit of a boffin
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2002 5:09 am
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Contact:

Log Page view

Post by DL4KG »

Hi Colin, thanks for the quick release of the build 10. The hidden USER field is now much smaller, but still visible (some mm are left). And WL32 came back with the option checked in the OPTIONS menue. So there is still some part of the bug left.

73 de Gerald - DL4KG

www.qsl.net/dl4kg

Edited by - dl4kg on 27/12/2003 6:45:21 PM
73 de Gerald - DL4KG
DL4KG
Bit of a boffin
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2002 5:09 am
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Contact:

Log Page view

Post by DL4KG »

Hi Colin,

problem is solved with build 11. Many thanks and HAPPY NEW YEAR.



73 de Gerald - DL4KG

www.qsl.net/dl4kg
73 de Gerald - DL4KG
Post Reply