PO-101 not giving sat_name in export adif
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 7:39 pm
Not sure if this has been discussed before, however I have just started using satellite PO-101 this week.
Usually I am able to export logs with AO-92, AO-91, SO-50, all the XW satellites, CAS-4a&b and AO-7 and have them upload perfectly into lotw using tqsl.
My PO-101 logs always fail and after examining the adif export file there is no sat_name after the comment field
here is the last part of the file - all else is good, except for missing this <SAT_NAME:>PO-101
<RST_SENT:2>59 <RST_RCVD:2>59 <PROP_MODE:3>SAT <COMMENT:6>PO-101
<DXCC:3:N>291 <EOR>
I think the comment field should followed with the sat_name field
below is the tail end of a AO-92 export which works fine
<RST_SENT:2>59 <RST_RCVD:2>59 <PROP_MODE:3>SAT <COMMENT:5>AO-92
<SAT_NAME:5>AO-92
<DXCC:3:N>291 <EOR>
is there anything I can do to fix this
thanks and other than this, it works perfectly
thanks Bob VA3CGA
Usually I am able to export logs with AO-92, AO-91, SO-50, all the XW satellites, CAS-4a&b and AO-7 and have them upload perfectly into lotw using tqsl.
My PO-101 logs always fail and after examining the adif export file there is no sat_name after the comment field
here is the last part of the file - all else is good, except for missing this <SAT_NAME:>PO-101
<RST_SENT:2>59 <RST_RCVD:2>59 <PROP_MODE:3>SAT <COMMENT:6>PO-101
<DXCC:3:N>291 <EOR>
I think the comment field should followed with the sat_name field
below is the tail end of a AO-92 export which works fine
<RST_SENT:2>59 <RST_RCVD:2>59 <PROP_MODE:3>SAT <COMMENT:5>AO-92
<SAT_NAME:5>AO-92
<DXCC:3:N>291 <EOR>
is there anything I can do to fix this
thanks and other than this, it works perfectly
thanks Bob VA3CGA