Search found 1833 matches
- Sat Mar 08, 2003 11:04 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Bug in PWR field
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7126
Bug in PWR field
<t>Going back to disabling the power list, having now spent some time on this I can see there are inherent problems with no values entered into the power list, as when restarting Winlog32 re-sets the default list. <br/> <br/> For various reasons I do not want to change this action.<br/> <br/> So I h...
- Sat Mar 08, 2003 1:50 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Bugs in WAB database
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3006
Bugs in WAB database
<t>Hi Riley<br/> <br/> I will correct the ommision of 'OV' in the WAB database for the next version. I will also make it possible for users to amend their existing WAB database with the 'OV' square.<br/> <br/> Regarding the other comments, despite pleas for help with the WAB database at the time of ...
- Fri Mar 07, 2003 5:52 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: VHF Locator check
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4036
VHF Locator check
<t>Hi Luc<br/> <br/> For v2 I have acted on your suggestion thus....<br/> <br/> When 4 figure locator is added to the locator check box the normal locator Search takes place, after which it is possible to add further two letters for the more accurate QTF.<br/> <br/> <br/> 73 Colin G0CUZ<br/> Winlog3...
- Fri Mar 07, 2003 5:52 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: VHF Locator check
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4036
VHF Locator check
<t>Winlog32 never did calculate to the corner on the large square e.g. IO91 (IO91AA) for a four figure locator, and heading/QRB is taken to near centre of the square unless a 6 figure locator is added.<br/> <br/> I see your point an the small square but think the differences would not make much prac...
- Fri Mar 07, 2003 4:05 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: mistake in DXCC database
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2478
mistake in DXCC database
<t>Hi Gerald<br/> <br/> I will correct the D8 South Korea entry in the Prefix database on next update.<br/> However the user can also append D8/South Korea to the user section of the prefix database by the following means:<br/> Enter D8 into Prefix search window.<br/> 'Souh Korea' (typo) will be dis...
- Sun Mar 02, 2003 6:44 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: database/log check robot probs
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2228
database/log check robot probs
<t>hi Simon<br/> <br/> Check that you have the latest version, e.g. v1.9 (menu/help/about window).<br/> <br/> I presume you ahve kept a back-up copy of your log database?<br/> Open Menu/File/New Log<br/> Click 'Make New Database' button<br/> Enter name of your log database WITHOUT the extension '.lo...
- Sat Mar 01, 2003 12:31 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Deleting duplicate WAB entries
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2719
Deleting duplicate WAB entries
<t>Hello Riley<br/> <br/> Deleting a record from a database is usually possible.<br/> <br/> First click the cursor on the line to be deleted.<br/> <br/> Now click on the leftmost column - the narrow grey one with the pointer, this will 'select' the entire row.<br/> <br/> Press the delete key.<br/> <...
- Wed Feb 26, 2003 8:45 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: QSL printing: sort order
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3563
QSL printing: sort order
<t>Hi Gerald<br/> <br/> Regarding the QSL label Sort order, there is not any way to group the W, K, N prefixes together, the sort is only alpha-numeric, so you could sort by call prefixes as this is an option along with any other sort order required for the labels. <br/> Sorting by Callsign may help...
- Wed Feb 26, 2003 8:45 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: QSL printing: sort order
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3563
QSL printing: sort order
Hi Gerald
Unfortunately it will not be possible to sort by QSL Managers for Label printing due to the way QSL managers are entered into the Log do not allow an alpha-numeric sort
73 Colin G0CUZ
Winlog32 Author
Unfortunately it will not be possible to sort by QSL Managers for Label printing due to the way QSL managers are entered into the Log do not allow an alpha-numeric sort
73 Colin G0CUZ
Winlog32 Author
- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:34 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: bug in the DXCC database?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2615
bug in the DXCC database?
<t>Hi Gerald<br/> <br/> As of v1.8 a new procedure was used to allow digi-modes to be grouped in the DXCC database which hitherto was not possible, the idea was that digi modes including RTTY will have a trailing space character added to the DXCC database 'Mode' thus "RTTY" will be entered as "RTTY ...