Thank you Colin. I have sent you an email.
73,
Joe 9H1CG
Search found 10 matches
- Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:46 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Remote logging
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5118
- Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:54 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Remote logging
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5118
Remote logging
Hi Colin, I have been using remote logging without any problem but find that with a single database containing multiple logs on the main logbook, it is impossible to change posting to a different log once one is selected on the remote PC. Any changes made in Options> Settings> Remote Database> Choos...
- Tue May 09, 2017 5:11 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Log check robot
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4308
Re: Log check robot
Thanks Colin, as you suggested, deleting and creating the database afresh is the best option and resolves the problem.
73, Joe
9H1CG - G4GTI
73, Joe
9H1CG - G4GTI
- Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:23 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: 630m - 472 Khz
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15328
Re: 630m - 472 Khz
Thanks for the explanation Colin. Speaking for myself, I would prefer to have the leading zero appear in the drop down list, as this would make it's requirement self explanatory, but as you explained, it would be ok whichever way you implement it. Thank you again for all the work you did to include ...
- Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:15 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Log check robot
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4308
Log check robot
Hi Colin, Is there any way to make the log check robot go through the "Mode" and perhaps the "Prop" fields to update any changes in the logs and have them recorded in the database? This question comes from the following scenario: I have imported a number of QSOs from the old DOS ...
- Wed Apr 12, 2017 6:28 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: 630m - 472 Khz
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15328
Re: 630m - 472 Khz
HI Colin, The problem has been resolved. I went to the "settings" page, deleted 0.472 as a band and chose .475 from the drop down menu. Next I went through the log and tried to edit each QSO by changing the band to .475 but this kept producing an "Enter only 'numeric' frequency band&q...
- Tue Apr 11, 2017 6:57 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: 630m - 472 Khz
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15328
Re: 630m - 472 Khz
Hi Colin, Thank you for the new Winlog32 release. It is downloaded and installed. How does one address 630m regarding frequency entry in Mhz ? I did add 0.472 as a band in "settings" when first entering QSOs for 630m but still, I do not see any DXCC data when querying the database in this ...
- Thu Mar 16, 2017 2:11 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: 630m - 472 Khz
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15328
Re: 630m - 472 Khz
Hi Colin, So sorry, but I have just seen this last post from you. Yes,I am aware of this problem. Initially, a few years back, we too were allocated a small segment at 500 khz,but then it seemed that the 472 Khz allocation was to become standard throughout Europe at least. You are right to point out...
- Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:58 pm
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: 630m - 472 Khz
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15328
Re: 630m - 472 Khz
Thanks Colin, I appreciate that.
73, Joe
73, Joe
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:36 am
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: 630m - 472 Khz
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15328
630m - 472 Khz
Hi, I have successfully imported over 24.000 QSOs into Winlog32 in 1 database with 6 different logs covering each band from 630m right up to 24 Ghz , run the log check robot on each log, and everything is fine with one exception. All bands are populated with QSOs except 60m as we are still awaiting ...